Introducing etherfarm v3.?
I’m tempted to release it as etherfarm 3.1, because 3.0 seemingly broke as soon as it was uploaded. I won’t begin to describe the nightmare I experienced today, but let’s just say that I’m thoroughly exhausted. A normal person probably could have gotten this show running in less than 3-4 hours. Me? No less than 11. Me and Mr. Vicodin have to sit down and have ourselves a little talk.
But I digress. Welcome to etherfarm 3.whatever.
I’ll offer a brief rundown of some of the changes, with a much longer and more comprehensive list to be posted to make it new in the next few days (I’m still compiling the list!)
- Here’s the good news: the new site is up and you can enjoy the new layout.
- Here’s the bad news: I severely overestimated the amount of work I can get do while high on pain meds. Don’t worry, there’s more coming (in fact much of it is already done), but I want to test the waters before uploading the whole thing.
- Here’s some more good news: No more links to unfinished sections, the sitemap is accurate, and the architecture of the site allows me to change and add sections by editing only one or two files.
- Here’s some more bad news: There are only 16 or so images in the new photo galleries (renamed gestalt, in the oculus section).
- Yet more good news: Come summer’s end, each one of those 16 images (and the hundreds I’ll upload between now and then) will be available for purchase as an archival-quality print in sizes up to 19”x13”. You’ll be able to order prints right off each image’s webpage, and you’ll be able to pay with a credit card. Basically, this time aroumd I’m going for quality over quantity, which requires me to analyze and adjust each of the old images individually.
I’m really proud of the code driving the new photo section. Since one of the new features is the ability to add text entries amidst the photo entries, I’ll be consolidating all photography, imagemaking/design, and [brand spankin’ new DSLR] camera posts to gestalt…starting now.
- A smidgeon of bad news: I’ve stopped checking this site on Opera and Omniweb.
- A smattering of good news: An overwhelming majority of the code validates as XHTML-strict in BBEdit, so once those browsers get their CSS and XHTML acts together, the site should work fine. Also, I hacked my machine to allow VirtualPC to test pages served off the Apache virtual hosts running on OS X. Geeks will appreciate the fact that on one machine, I code, serve, and test on both Mac and PC browsers. Non-geek, upon reading the last sentence, will probably never visit this site again. In any case, I’ve been able to test the new site on IE6 / Windows XP. It’s no secret that I’m a Mac fan, but sweet pappy mo’lassie…compare Let me know if anything looks fucky. Also, the old site is still up, kinda, just so that I can let people who link directly to certain pages know that the URLs have changed. Also, I have absolutely no idea how trackbacks work, but I’ve got them now, and if anyone wants to tell me if I’ve got them working, that would be just fine with me.
top
18 responses
Comment posted at 23:36 on Monday, July 14, 2003
Just making sure this actually works.
top
selenium
Comment posted at 08:48 on Tuesday, July 15, 2003
Looks great res! love that crazy cali slug. Who needs bones anyway…?
top
Comment posted at 11:07 on Tuesday, July 15, 2003
the XP page looks bad because you don’t have cleartype turned on. control panel, display, appearance, effects, “use the following methods to smooth screen fonts”, listbox=cleartype.
on my machine etherfarm looks exactly like your safari screenshot, except for the difference between OS X and XP browser gadgets.
top
inspoetica
Comment posted at 12:28 on Tuesday, July 15, 2003
Nice. Very nice. Glad you’re back!
top
Comment posted at 12:59 on Tuesday, July 15, 2003
Jon, thanks for the tip. I’ll check it out and update the entry. For the record, I’ll cop to the fact that “mac fan” usually just means “wintel-ignorant”. Also for the record, though, it’s not just the antialiasing which makes the safari page look better—kerning, hinting, etc…all standard OS X stuff. And to my knowledge, cleartype doesn’t fix IE’s inability to render a dotted line.
I’m currently looking at the site on IE6 on Windows 98SE, and there’s some really funky alignment stuff going on with the comment input fields and the comments. Argh. I’ll endeavor to get this fixed soon.
top
selenium
Comment posted at 14:16 on Tuesday, July 15, 2003
hey man. that’s happening in xp IE6 too (alignment thing)
top
Comment posted at 14:59 on Tuesday, July 15, 2003
Beautiful! Great work!
top
Comment posted at 15:18 on Tuesday, July 15, 2003
If it ain’t broke, diddle and tinker anyway, eh? I miss the hayrolls. Why call it a farm, if you got rid of the farm images. I’ve renamed your link, “etherslug”.
Probably having sluggish feelings with the back still on the mend. Seriously, it is interesting in an evolutionary sense. Will version 4.0 use a photo of a higher life form than a slug?
top
heisenberg
Comment posted at 15:21 on Tuesday, July 15, 2003
In the comments, each one has expanded margins over the previous one, in the Win 2000, IE I’m using. It looks like a very local thing that corrupts comment margins with some sequence counter. This should be wider than the last one I posted.
top
Comment posted at 15:39 on Tuesday, July 15, 2003
heisenberg, yeah I noticed that. It’s odd to me because there are no increasing variables or anything like that. IE does some wierd stuff with boxes.
This will take some work, I’m afraid.
top
Comment posted at 18:05 on Tuesday, July 15, 2003
Wow, now this is a nice looking site. Good work.
top
Comment posted at 10:43 on Wednesday, July 16, 2003
how… wide… will… it… get???
top
13
Trackbacked at 12:59 on Wednesday, July 16, 2003
Sporting a brand new 3.whatever design version, the massively beautiful etherfarm is back. This is one of those sites that I was talking about a few days ago, so well done that envy must be suppressed. If there were a…
top
Comment posted at 16:32 on Wednesday, July 16, 2003
Ahhh. Got the comments alignment working, or close enough anyway. As I said to Selenium on the phone, how I got it working makes even less sense than why it didn’t work in the first place (and as expected, the problem was exclusively with IE). I’ll propagate the comments code throughout the site in the next few days.
Thanks to everyone who has said such nice things about the new design in emails, on their websites, and on this website. It’s quite flattering to get complements, and even more so from people whose work I admire greatly.
And thanks to charleshartman.org for being the first-ever etherfarm trackbacker! I love it when this shit just works!
top
Comment posted at 09:35 on Thursday, July 17, 2003
Where do you get these wonderful photos?
top
Comment posted at 10:50 on Thursday, July 17, 2003
Looks great, and less filling.
top
Comment posted at 13:04 on Saturday, July 19, 2003
Wow. I’m speechless, and very jealous. While programming all this would be ok for me, I have 0 creative cell in my noggin that can make the switch to creative design and layout. I’m not worthy.
Nice job.
top
Comment posted at 19:05 on Sunday, August 24, 2003
Good looking site, I really likt the choise of typeface on the left menu but I have one question:
How did you get Virtual PC to see your page offline ?!?!
top
What's This?
∗Required field
♦Email addresses are never published
§Followup comment notifications contain a link to turn off further notification
†The captcha system verifies you're a human by having you enter text which spambots cannot read.
About Comments
IPs are logged and can be banned, so be civil and don't make an ass of yourself.
Registering greatly simplifies comment entry.
Allowed Tags
a, blockquote, em, strong
Note: only the above tags will be used in submitted comments, despite what that sneaky live preview leads you to believe.
top